Kalamazoo Law Enforcement released info showing the truth
In an embarrassing turn of events, Obama had to choke back his words when Kalamazoo law enforcement released information that the shooter’s weapon was legal and properly registered. Via Breitbart.com
In comments made at the National Governors Association Reception, Obama cited the Kalamazoo gunman, saying, “Earlier this year, I took some steps that will make it harder for dangerous people, like this individual, to buy a gun.”
But on February 23 — the very day after Obama made this claim — law enforcement officials in Kalamazoo announced that Dalton’s gun was properly “registered” and “legally” owned. And this was in addition to previous reports that Dalton has no criminal history and no history of mental illness.
What this means is that Obama’s executive gun controls — focused largely on an incremental expansion of background checks — would not have stopped Dalton from acquiring his gun.
It was the same in other recent attacks. Expanded background-checks in California did not stop Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik from acquiring the guns they used in the Dec. 2 San Bernardino shooting, nor stop Elliot Rodger from acquiring the pistol he used to carry out his May 2014 attack in Santa Barbara.
So… turns out unconstitutional background checks did nothing in preventing a mass shooter from his rampage?
Does this come as a surprise to any of us?
There was a study done by the Washington Post, of all media, that fact checked Marco Rubio’s statement that no gun laws put in place would have prevented the major shootings America has experienced.
It completely stumped the reporter put on the story, because after checking all the major shootings dating back to Newtown, it was a completely true statement.
I don’t know why it’s such a hard concept for anti-gun supporters to understand, but criminals don’t follow the law! It doesn’t matter how many new laws and measures are created, in the end criminals and bad people will always do what they do best: not follow the law.
Even if guns were banned, who would end up with the guns? You guessed it, the criminals.
The people who would suffer would be those who actually follow the law, they would be at a complete disadvantage.
So keep trying to persuade us on how well your unconstitutional executive orders are saving lives Obama, but we aren’t the least bit convinced.